No, no we didn't. Before the iPhone we wanted a device that would be something like a Palm pilot, an iPod, a cell phone, a camera, and give us mobile internet, but it wasn't clear how to do that in a good way. Blackberry was getting there, Pocket PC was interesting, and there were various other mobile devices that had some of the pieces. It wasn't until the iPhone we saw how to put that all together properly.
I think that’s more of a hindsight than a concrete wish people had.
Audio player, cell phone and camera were already implemented by “dumbphone” Nokias. I think adding mobile internet was a mistake. I use it all the time but it doesn’t add much to my life. It doesn’t make me more productive but it adds another consumption device.
It's absolutely a wish I had, and I spent a lot of time and money trying to make it real!
There's a huge difference between an audio player and having spotify (or apple music, or whatever you prefer) where you can play effectively any song you want at effectively any time.
There's a huge difference between having a camera and something which can record 4k video or take photos which surpass any digital camera we had in the early 2000s and even today surpasses virtually any camera in the price range of the whole phone. You would need something like a Leica fixed lens camera or a mirrorless DSLR with multiple lenses at several times the cost of a smartphone to equal the photo and video capabilities. This also ignores the fact that I can snap these amazing pics or videos and send them to a friend instantly.
I know I wanted mobile internet and was very frustrated with things like WAP at the time. I know that having mobile internet made me more productive. Sure some phones could play music but it was nothing like a dedicated music device, the software and storage were just awful, so you had to have two devices when it was obvious that it should be just one. Something like the iPhone was pretty obviously being desired at the time, we just didn't see how to do it and thought it would be something more like what blackberry and Microsoft were doing.
I have mobile internet since 2001. Those dumbphones had access to the full internet, not just WAP.
Mobile internet was not a mistake, we just started to use it wrongly. It's your choice to not use it to browse internet aimlessly. It's your choice to make yourself available all the time. You can definitely use it how I did for more than a decade before everybody realized what being always online means. It definitely improved my productivity before that, but it's true that the added benefit is about flat in the past decade.
I don't think it's that we use it wrong exactly. I'm not trying to judge anyone who spends hours of time on Instagram sending photos or scrolling X.
I 100% agree that if I was doing those things, they would be wrong for me so I avoid doing them.
I don't like people who say "I don't like when I do this thing, so, this thing should not be available for people to do!"
I equally don't like people who say "I don't like when other people do this thing, so, this thing should not be available for people to do!"
I know that social media is designed to be addictive. This is why I'm mostly absent from it for most of my life.
If you use and enjoy social media and it brings joy to your life, great, have fun. It wasn't doing that for me (or more directly, I realized very early on it was going down a bad path) so I cut it out.
If you're lamenting social media and bothered by how much time you spend on it, or how it negatively impacts your life, or whatever: I am definitely going to advocate to you that you do simply have the option to turn it off. Life will move on!
You can also have a smart phone and not feel the need to immediately respond to every text message, nor, click every notification. You can even choose to not pick up phone calls if you want.
In the past decade while the reality of mobile connectivity hasn't changed much, the quality and ubiquity of it has improved dramatically.
10 years ago I would have agreed that in most places it was possible to get some form of internet connectivity, today, it's deeply unusual to travel anywhere in the USA and not get >100Mbit on LTE with "good enough" latency.
Of course, most people goes to places with coverage, but for example if you travel between population centers (cities, towns, etc), then it's quite frequent that you don't have internet, or just terrible one. Especially if you're on a train which insulates somewhat, and of course speed is also a degrading factor.
Years ago I thought mobile Internet didn’t add anything to my life. I bought a smartphone but was skeptical.
Then one day I was at the airport waiting in a long check-in line. I got out my Motorola Droid, dug though my email, checked in to the flight, and got out of the line.
After that I was convinced of the value of it, and I’m reminded every time I’m standing on the street, waiting for an Uber rather than looking around for a cab.
I was a long-time holdout on getting a smartphone at all, then on really embracing it. Now I gotta admit, it’s the only computing device I use that really delivers ROI for my everyday life (aside from my work computer, for… work, but that’s not mine). All the rest could vanish and it’d mostly just give me fewer ways to frustratingly waste my time. Phone dies, and I gotta replace it ASAP. Everything important happens on there. A compact sensor package glued to good touchscreen, with an Internet connection, is just too useful.
