Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> They cost $30... It would be an easier advice to consumer if they were $19.

It'd be easier if it were $0 too but what does that have to do with anything? $30 is what it costs to make a cable that can do high speed data, high speed display, and high power. If you want a cable that does all of this it's going to cost more than a cable that doesn't. If you want a cable that's cheaper and doesn't do everything that is also an option. Apart from both options being available anyways this problem has nothing to do with USB standards.

> and still not support 240W

When the brand new standard actually hits the shelf you'll be able to get a TB4 240W cable, as of now there just aren't any 240W cables in general. Also not supported: USB 6 and 2 kW PD or anything else from the future instead of present.

.

Type C is an interface specification not a guarantee that you're $19 cable will be compatible everything man could desire to implement in your lifetime.



>Type C is an interface specification not a guarantee that you're $19 cable will be compatible everything man could desire to implement in your lifetime.

Except that is exactly what a lot of people think Type C will and should provide. And whether you agree with that they think or not is an entirely different question.

My other reply https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29452173


Whether people think it will or won't isn't the question - it's not the USB standards that make this ask is impossible.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: