Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interesting. I didn't know that they were even more expensive than normal nuclear plants. Do you have sources, so that I don't have to cite you comment the next time I talk about breeder reactors?


"Economics of the Fuel Cycle" by Guillaume De Roo & John E. Parsons

http://www.mit.edu/~jparsons/Presentations/090501%20CEEPR%20...

See slide 18 for the key result:

"Closed cycle costs are higher by 42%"

This slide deck also gives references to more detailed reports.

Fans of traveling wave reactors, molten salt reactors, and other not-actually-operating reactors will quote rosily low cost projections despite the lack of any empirical evidence. They're not worth arguing with. If/when commercial TWRs or MSRs actually exist, then we can compare costs. Right now the advanced reactor cost claims are on par with Battery Breakthrough of the Week stories about how a laboratory experiment could revolutionize energy in 10 years, if it's followed up with a lot of funding and absolutely no problems crop up along the way.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: