What is a "bunny suit" in this context? The web results make me wonder if there was miscommunication about hiring plumbers for a "very dirty job" if you know what I mean.

Something like this: https://www.nciclean.com/disposable-bunny-suits.html

(For reference, I searched "bunny suit ppe" to find an example.)

Now having read this comment, I can't think of anything non-dirty.

> An erotic novelist has their human brain and human instincts to guide them in writing their work.

An ML agent trained on all the erotic novels written, weighted by critical and popular success would might be quite capable of generating sequels, "original" stories, or even stories bespoke to each reader.

Good Will Hunting suggests first-hand experience is irreducible: "You can't tell me what it smells like in the Sistine Chapel." https://youtu.be/oRG2jlQWCsY

To which Westworld counters: "Well if you can't tell, does it matter?" https://youtu.be/kaahx4hMxmw

I think the cowboys have it. For the moment though, it's still up to humans to decide how this plays out.

This argues in bad faith and is escalatory. No need to die on "pimp" hill.

The comment expressing dislike for the name didn't accuse or say anything about intentional offensiveness, only that they felt it wasn't appropriate in a professional setting. "Someone will happily take offense to anything" isn't true but many commenters have expressed dislike for this particular name. Nobody's coming for the words "bread" or "computer" anytime soon.

"Beautify my readme" or "glow up my readme" would convey the same meaning without the unnecessary sex trade connotation. That would let the work be shared in professional settings and put off fewer people, both positives! Charitably, the original author may not have considered negative connotations for the name. At least now they know it's not universally beloved.

I'm happy to die on "pimp" hill. Not because I care about the project name, or the word. I don't have strong feelings about either.

> The comment expressing dislike for the name didn't accuse or say anything about intentional offensiveness, only that they felt it wasn't appropriate in a professional setting.

Their comment includes a rant about sexual exploitation. By it's nature as a comment directed at the OP, implies it's relevant to the name of the project. The best interpretation I was able to come up with is they thought OP didn't know, and thought it was important to point out that the word pimp is 'bad in their opinion'. diskzero's reply is a perfect counter example, they're careful to speak to the reasons objectively. Observing vs complaining (admittedly what I read as complaining.)

> "Someone will happily take offense to anything" isn't true but many commenters have expressed dislike for this particular name. Nobody's coming for the words "bread" or "computer" anytime soon.

But it is true, I can cite plenty of examples of people not being allowed to do cool things because someone complained. It's great that no ones' coming for bread or computer. But I already have so few words, I'm not willing to let anyone "come for" any of them. not even the ones I think are stupid. Not now, and not after soon, however big soon is.

(to be clear I don't think that's what anyone is trying to do, only that It is a hill worth dying on)

> would convey the same meaning

Disagree, as clearly did the author.

In the article's context of classical art yes many famous paintings and sculptures show penises.

I was responding in particular to the commenter's point about the acceptability of nudity beyond the context of art.

When do the nipples of a man transitioning to a woman become unacceptable?

Years and years ago I remember seeing a program that was broadcast on some dry, educational TV channel that was showing someone undergoing transitional surgery, and you could just imagine the censors sweating profusely as they decided the arbitrary point at which the nipple blur kicked in.

There's great images I see on Instagram where someone will photoshop a male nipple on top of a female breast to show the absurdity of the whole thing. Someone who is transitioning is another great example, as is the occasional voluptuous man boob.

"You operate a little bit like a therapist and confidante, most men do not want to f*k just a body, they want to f*k a soul."

That part was weird given that women on dating subreddits complain about how guys only want them for sex.

A guy who wants a relationship may only have sex with a handful of women. While a guy who just wants sex can get into the hundreds. That's hundreds of experiences reinforcing that men only want sex compared to just a few saying the opposite. Samppling bias you could say.

Yeah I think you're absolutely right that is a factor

It's like the old adage in Hollywood that you had to sell your soul to the devil. Clearly the predators in Hollywood were the devils.