Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | SonicSoul's commentslogin

great comment!

imagine being a photographer that takes decades to perfect their craft. sure another student can study and mimic your style. but it's still different than some computer model "ingesting" vast amount of photos and vomiting something similar for $5.99 in aws cpu cost so that some prompt jockey can call themselves an AI artist and make money off of other peoples talent.

i get that this is cynical and does not encompass all ai art, but why not let computers develop their own style wihout ingesting human art? that's when it would actually be AI art


Like 99.9% of the art the common people care about is Darth Vader and Taylor Swift and other pop culture stuff like that.

These people literally don’t care what your definition of what is and isn’t art is, or how it’s made, they just want a lock screen wallpaper of themselves fighting against Thanos on top of a volcano.

The argument of “what is art” has been an academic conversation largely ignored by the people actually consuming the art for hundreds of years. Photography was just pop culture trash, comics were pop culture trash, stick figure web comics were pop culture trash. Today’s pop culture trash is the “prompt jockey”.

I make probably 5-10 pictures every day over the course of maybe 20 minutes as jokes on Teams because we have Bing Chat Enterprise. My coworkers seem to enjoy it. Nobody cares that it’s generated. I’m also not trying to be an “artist” whatever that means. It just is, and it’s fun. I wasn’t gonna hire an artist to draw me pictures to shitpost to my coworkers. It’s instead unlocked a new fun way to communicate.


not entirely sure what your point is, but i think you are saying that art is just a commodity we use for cheap entertainment so it's ok for computers to do the same?

in the context of what i was saying the definition of what is art can be summed up as anything made by humans. i have no problem when its used in memes and being open sourced etc.. the issue i have is when a human invests real time into it and then its taken and regurgitated without their permission. do you see that distinction?


I mean, I don't think many care about your personal use of art. You can take copyright images and shit post and Disney won't go suing your workplace.

But many big players do want to use this commercially and that's where a lot of these lines start to form. No matter how lawsuits go you will probably still be able to find some LLM to make Thanos fighting a volcano. It's just a matter of how/if companies can profit from it.


This response should be gilded


That's a funny argument because artists lost their shit over photography too. Now anyone can make a portrait! Photography will kill art!

Art is the biggest gate kept industry there is and I detest artists who believe only they are the chosen one.

Art is human expression. We all have a right to create what we want with whatever tools we want. They can adapt or be left behind. No sympathy from me.


Because that's not what happens, ever. You wouldn't ask a human to have their style of photographing when they don't know what a photograph even looks like.


astrology ignorant here.

are those light rings portrayed this way because its debris orbiting at a very long exposure ?


Astrology? I think you mean Astronomy.


Astrology Ignorance is a Good Thing! Cultivate it.


No; the rings are made up of tiny particles, so they appear contiguous. You'd have to get very close to see the individual chunks.


*astronomy


it blew my mind when i logged into dropbox that sharing my data with third party "vetted" AI companies was enabled by default.

i just wrote a WTF email to their support, but most likely i will be discontinuing my account. can't imagine what they can possibly say that will make this OK


I saw the writing on the wall when they started sending ads via their notification system with no way to turn it off. I'm on pCloud now, but its not looking like it's not much better, They recently started spamming my mobile app with thanks giving ads to upgrade to a different tier of their product even though I had offer notifications turned off.

I had some words with their support department, here is what they said:

>Hello,

>Thank you for contacting pCloud's Technical Support.

>This is a pCloud banner for Black Friday and it's not a notification. Unfortunately, you won't be able to remove it manually and you should wait until the end of the Black Friday promo - 30.11.2023.

>Should you require any further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.

>Regards,

>George Lewis

>pCloud's Technical Support

Like it matters that its not a notification. You still need my consent regardless of what kind of ad it is.


heh.. here is the response i got.

  Hi there,
 
  Thanks for taking the time to write in to Dropbox Support. My name is Ross, and I will provide assistance with your case.
 
  From my understanding, you are inquiring about being opted into Dropbox AI by default.
 
  Thank you for alerting us to this problem.
 
  Dropbox engineers are aware of the problem and are working on a solution.
 
  Also, please note that no files were shared in this case.
 
  Sorry for any inconvenience this is causing.
 
  We'll update you shortly on this issue.
 
  Don't hesitate to reach out to me again for further questions!
 
  Best regards,
  Ross


This sounds like a variation on the line that "it's not an ad if we aren't getting paid to show it to you". Like with Windows notifications "informing" you of other Microsoft products. It's bullshit, and is one of the things that decreases trust.


oh wow.. refactoring is an art form. just because your code "works" doesn't mean you have to leave it alone. your working code will likely be copied into 5 other projects and will not scale well.

ideally you're investing into creating shareable code libraries and into infrastructure that makes the process of maintaining/referencing shared components easy enough for engineers to want to dedicate their precious sprint time to it.


engineer, being a logical man, refused to believe that this man's car was allergic to vanilla ice cream. He arranged, therefore, to continue his visits for as long as it took to solve the problem.

the moral of this story, the engineer being a logical man refused to try reproducing the problem and devoted infinite time to watching the user shop every night. that way he gets paid to hang and eat ice cream


damn i missed this! do you know if its possible to still get one of those???


toool is an organization worthy of the support, and they sell a version of it.


Do you have a link? I'm not seeing one at toool.nl




original article has audio read by a human



interesting, what are your use cases?


Safari, not Chrome, but here's an AppleScript I use to map a trackpad gesture to the "next page" link on a wide variety of Web sites,

    tell application "Safari" to do JavaScript "
        (() => {
            const loc = Array
                  .from(document.querySelectorAll('[rel=\"next\"], .next, [title=\"Next page\"]'))
                  .map(i => i.getAttribute('href')).filter(i => i)[0];
            if (loc) {
                document.location = loc;
            }
        })()
    " in document 1
s/next/prev/g s/Next/Previous/ for the matching "previous page" script.

Note that this requires Safari's "AllowJavaScriptFromAppleEvents" preference to be set, either via a "Develop" menu option or directly in its preferences file via, e.g., the

    defaults write com.apple.Safari AllowJavaScriptFromAppleEvents -bool TRUE
shell command, and that this setting allows any program you authorize[1] to send Apple Events to Safari to potentially do Terrible Things. Given that the setting is both disabled and hidden by default, and additionally gated by an opt-in privacy preference, it's presumably an unlikely target for garden-variety malware, however.

[1] Check the Automation group in the Privacy tab of the Security & Privacy preference pane for a list of programs so authorized.


I can’t answer that question exactly because that’s driving Chrome, but I wrote an AppleScript the other day to make zoom less dreadful.

I annotate on screens all day and there are no useful shortcuts for moving between drawing and erasing. Also the drawing button requires 2 clicks. I’ve wired my wacom tablet so the two buttons fire off shortcuts, they run a service I’ve registered in the menus, they run the applescript, it fishes about for the right windows in zoom and clicks the buttons. It could not have worked but it just happens to because I can trigger a button and then focus moves to the next button (which I can’t otherwise target) and then I can push “space” to get the job done.


Here’s one of the scripts if anyone wants to see how weird it all is.

    tell application "System Events"
    repeat with theProcess in processes
        if not background only of theProcess then
            tell theProcess
                set processName to name
                set theWindows to windows
            end tell
            set windowsCount to count of theWindows

            if processName is "zoom.us" then
                repeat with theWindow in theWindows
      tell theWindow
   set theSize to size
                        set windowName to name
      end tell
                    if windowName is "annotation panel" then
                        if item 1 of theSize is 776 then
                            tell theWindow to tell button 5 to click
                            key code 49
                        else
                            tell theWindow to tell button 4 to click
                            key code 49
                        end if
      end if
                end repeat
            end if
        end if
    end repeat
    end tell


looks cool

tried the code playground, but seems there is no intellisense?

i think that would be very useful to learning


Others have suggested autocomplete before. I opened https://github.com/alexmojaki/futurecoder/issues/120 in response as a place to talk about it. But in general my opinion is that it would probably actually be harmful to learning for beginners, and I'd need to see evidence to convince me otherwise.

Here's my favorite explanation why: https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/a/634

Here's another similar discussion: https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/questions/5777/python-...


I strongly disagree here. Attention to detail is the defining characteristic of a software developer. Intellisense should only be used by those who already developed that skill.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: