>That doesn't mean other properties (e.g. the evils of slavery) of those things automatically become transposable.
And likewise, just because things aren't exactly the same, doesn't mean that don't share many properties.
You are playing word games and have failed to address any of the content. Share owners, slave owners, the phrases differ by two letters. Western culture is a direct descendant of Roman culture, it would be strange if there weren't large similarities, especially at the level of organizational institutions. Why would you expect that the concept of people holding power over other people through directing them on what to do would just vanish?
You would do better to point out the actual differences than to fall back on the claim that because a word is slightly different there may be something different between the two.
Well, they don't. "Slave" comes from the Old Church Slavonic word for Slavs, "Sloveninu," which is probably from the word "slovo," meaning speech, while "share" ultimately comes from the Proto Indo-European root "skar-," meaning to cut.
And likewise, just because things aren't exactly the same, doesn't mean that don't share many properties.
You are playing word games and have failed to address any of the content. Share owners, slave owners, the phrases differ by two letters. Western culture is a direct descendant of Roman culture, it would be strange if there weren't large similarities, especially at the level of organizational institutions. Why would you expect that the concept of people holding power over other people through directing them on what to do would just vanish?
You would do better to point out the actual differences than to fall back on the claim that because a word is slightly different there may be something different between the two.