It says "all objects of the same constructor", which can be losslessly translated to "all objects with the same prototype that were created using JavaScript's retarded way of trying to look kind of like a class-based OO language when really it's not at all".
It's rather "expanded using knowledge about Javascript object model plus subjective opinion about JS being retarded" than "losslesly translated".
Given that said knowledge is the knowledge that the slides are meant to convey, we have some circular reasoning here.
I didn't say JS was retarded, I said the particular way it tries to look like a class-based OO language even though it isn't was retarded.
Given that you were critiquing #67 as though you thought you already understood the information, I felt it was fair game to call you out for being wrong about it. Apologies.
It's rather "expanded using knowledge about Javascript object model plus subjective opinion about JS being retarded" than "losslesly translated".
Given that said knowledge is the knowledge that the slides are meant to convey, we have some circular reasoning here.