Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I question whether the original death here would have been tracked as rabies Vs heart attack.

Which also suggests perhaps it is slightly more common than data suggests



From the CDC report [1], it's pretty clear that rabies was not considered for the donor until after the donee died and rabies was confirmed. Possibly because the donor had been scratched by a skunk and not biten. The report says the scratch had been noted on the donor risk assessment interview (DRAI), but that skunks are not considered a reservoir for rabies in his area.

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/74/wr/mm7439a1.htm


Skunks also aren't aggressive...

I thought rabies had to be considered for any interaction with a wild animal. For one showing atypical behavior, the indication is that much stronger.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: