Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That "waste of resources" is completely made up, this changes nothing for any existing repo what so ever. Any existing repo that updated did so completely voluntarily, no tool forced them to.

At most you could argue that you needed to run one additional command when pushing the initial commit during this transitional period where GitLab/GitHub had updated the name but Git itself has not. Therefore, now we're back to square one with less "waste" as you put it.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: