Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think that's an accurate description of the full scope of the problem. The codec itself is mostly unused but the code path can possibly be triggered from file fuzzing that ffmpeg uses so a maliciously crafted payload (e.g. any run of ffmpeg that touches user input without disabling this codec) could possibly be exploited.


Why does google simply build their own ffmpeg from source without the codec?


They almost certainly do. But it's also in the public interest to responsibly disclose vulnerabilities in components that don't directly affect you.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: