Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> No, he does not. He has been a pillar of the community since the beginning, and well loved by many.

These are not mutually exclusive states. If anything, it has improved my esteem of PSL that they were willing to hold one of their "inner circle" up to scrutiny.

Even Linus Torvalds came around to the idea that he was a great software engineer and a mean individual to interact with. There's room for improvement in most if not all of us. I'm impressed at both Tim and the PSL for being able to disagree, go through a suspension, and come to terms. It's the kind of potential for growth that makes it a comfortable ecosystem to work in.

> The supposed "rule violations" include things that no reasonable person could actually object to

The problem with the "reasonable person" standard is that it's subjectivity masked in objectivity; we don't poll ten thousand people to decide what "reasonable" looks like. It's another term for "common sense," and... Common sense moves. Common sense said slavery was fine three hundred years ago. Common sense said homosexuality was an abomination sixty years ago. Common sense said you could be as awful to interact with as you wanted as long as you were making software people craved thirty years ago. We grow and change.



> If anything, it has improved my esteem of PSL that they were willing to hold one of their "inner circle" up to scrutiny.

Their scrutiny is utter nonsense, as demonstrated by even a superficial examination of the facts.

He was (and still is) well loved by many (including myself, despite our political disagreements) specifically because of his demeanor.

> The problem with the "reasonable person" standard

And yet it's good enough to appear all over the law. None of the examples you describe bear any resemblance to the current situation.

Again: Tim Peters did not do anything wrong. We know what actions the list in https://discuss.python.org/t/three-month-suspension-for-a-co... refers to; most have been characterized unfairly or are even flat-out false. For the rest, if you have an argument as to how the action taken was actually in violation of what is described in https://policies.python.org/python.org/code-of-conduct/, you are welcome to present it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: