Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The value of the space is whatever the user/team finds valuable.

You almost had the right idea there: the value of what this emits is really in the summary of diffs. I'm certainly not going to go through each commit and read the diff each time I look at the log, but I still want to understand what happened and be able to find individual commits. If extra information about the author's thoughts is just not available, I'd much rather have summaries than a blank log of "WIP" comments.

It's absurd to gatekeep commit messages to only "the thoughts of the author", even if that's what usually goes in there. A good diff summary might even be more useful than a ramble that doesn't mention important changes.



It's not absurd, and it's also not gatekeeping.

Why do you want a summary of the changes? The bulk of the information in a commit is the diff itself.

The information that is not contained in the diff is the author's intent, and that's what the space is meant to contain.

I'm not convinced you actually believe that a summary is valuable because this whole comment is coming from a very defensive place.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: