Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Antifa as a Terrorist Threat. Antifa is a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government, law enforcement authorities, and our system of law.

Does it? Or does it call for the Trump administration to be overthrown?



> Does it? Or does it call for the Trump administration to be overthrown?

From an outsider’s perspective they ARE asking for a democratically elected government to be overthrown.


Who are the "they" referenced in this statement?


I think there are forms of government that hardcore antifa would accept but they have no continuity with existing common law and zero chance of being elected in the US. So in some sense they do want the overthrow of any and all US governments.


The two flags in the logo represent the communist and anarchist flags. The part about wanting to do away with the US government isn't exactly inaccurate.


Yea, except that logo is from the original German Antifa, who was concerned with doing away with a different government…


The original Antifa opposed both Nazis and moderates. They were particularly eager to oppose social democrats, which Stalin and Comintern saw as their main enemies. And it lasted little more than a year before the Nazis took over.


An oxymoron if I ever saw one.


anarchist communism, or anarcho-communism, is a coherent political philosophy. you can read about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism


Do you think that talking about overthrowing the legitimately elected government should not qualify as "terrorist threat"?


As long as we consider the Jan 6 rioters terrorists as well, I’m good.


I'm fine with that, in case you think this was some kinda gotcha


Jan 6 happened and is pardoned. "Overthrowing the government" is just talk.

Shifting the focus on that talk is rethoric, this talk is unimportant and inconsequential compared to Jan 6.


I believe the phrase they used to describe J6 was "legitimate political discourse" https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/us/politics/republicans-j...


They were just picnickers out having a good time. I guess.


Terrorism generally has specific elements; violence done against civilians for political or religious ends. So the Oklahoma City bombing would be terrorism, but the mass shooting in Las Vegas would not be. Unless calling for the overthrow of the govt includes a call to violence against civilians, it would not fit the traditional definition of terrorism.


Is violent language terrorism? Most definitions seem to include physical violence. But not all.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition_of_terrorism


So how would that compare with Trumps crowd storming the capitol?

That was apparently fine, but antifa calling for it (if that even happened) is terrorism?

Politicians call for governments to resign/quit etc on a regular basis. Happened here in New Zealand last week.


Are they threatening violence against the public (you know, terrorism) or not? Governments can be overthrown without violence, let alone terrorism




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: