Hell, I couldn't even get a "pirated" copy via archive.is, so instead I'll just ...

VWWHFSfQ · 2025-09-21T09:40:04 1758447604

> If I can't get their long-form, well-researched articles for free with no strings attached whatsoever, then I will add this to my mental filter of sites I will never, ever read under any circumstances.

throwaway290 · 2025-09-21T08:07:11 1758442031

> "pirated"

Why quotes?

By the way this article is not just a rehash of wikipedia like most stuff. Somebody did research. I know because I have no money to subscribe and I thought surely it's all on wikipedia. But there is literally nothing about Amelia

komali2 · 2025-09-21T08:24:46 1758443086

I found this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amelia_(1795_ship) which may be that ship and it's indicated it may have been a slaver and is in the ballpark of the right time period.

Ironically there was an HMS Amelia that was first used to defend slavery and then used to uphold abolishment of the slave trade https://yarmouthmuseums.wordpress.com/2021/06/15/the-hms-ame...

wrp · 2025-09-21T11:19:54 1758453594

Could it be this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitty's_Amelia_(1803_ship)

throwaway290 · 2025-09-22T10:06:54 1758535614

This can be it...

throwaway290 · 2025-09-21T08:53:04 1758444784

Yes I saw it and it's very little info

mhuffman · 2025-09-21T10:37:34 1758451054

>By the way this article is not just a rehash of Wikipedia like most stuff. Somebody did research.

Maybe. The seven sentences that are not paywall blocked didn't give any references and spent 1/4 of that talking about another more well-known ship.

Here is a blog post about the ship. It may or may not be better than the paywalled post.[0]

[0]https://yarmouthmuseums.wordpress.com/2021/06/15/the-hms-ame...

throwaway290 · 2025-09-22T10:03:06 1758535386

Your link seems to be about another ship.