Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's a cheaper alternative, if you don't mind some manual setup:

- buy an ethernet -> phone adapter (Grandstream, Cisco, and Poly sell these) and a cheap analog phone.

- get an inexpensive VoIP number[0] and set up the phone adapter to log into the service you set up.

- set up a Google Voice[1] number if you haven't already. When you want to make an outgoing call, use the Google Voice app to initiate a call to your VoIP number[2] -- that way you're technically receiving the call there, so it's cheaper or free, depending on your plan.

[0] CallCentric has a $3/month plan that gives you free incoming calls and e911 service: https://www.callcentric.com/faq/46/529. This works well if you initiate outgoing calls via the Google Voice app.

[1] As of 2023, Google Voice doesn't work directly with Obitalk VoIP service anymore, or with any other VoIP devices :(

[2] if you need to let kids make outgoing calls via Google Voice unattended, set up the Google Voice app on an old iOS device in Guided Access mode and plug it in next to the analog phone. (But make sure they know to make 911 calls using the phone itself, not the GVoice app. I suggest printing a "Emergency: call 911 on this phone" label and putting it on the back of the handset.



Maybe I’m going out on a limb here?… Even this thrifty and most excellent (party on Garth!) 3 to 17 step process might slightly reduce adoption by the target audience: kids.


Set up a couple of ip phones to connect to the other every off-hook, no dialing. Think Batman Batphone!


IP Phone Roulette!


I guess we’re gonna have to teach those kids to read the fine manual. (I agree with you entirely in this case. Show them easy mode then if they want a challenge they can do hard mode.)


Voip.ms is $0.50/mo per DID. After that billing is either an unlimited plan or per minute.


Not going to host a SIP server?

Geez this place has gone downhill.

/S



This doesn’t include the whitelisting for incoming and outgoing calls, which is a prominent feature.


That was my thought. Magic Jack basically does the same thing but cheaper and better.


> There's a cheaper alternative, if you don't mind some manual setup:

The whole point of this is for people who a) don't want a manual setup and, more importantly, b) want to be able to easily whitelist allowed numbers to contact. Your solution completely misses the point. (And no, having "Tinkerer" in your username doesn't give you latitude.)

Why is it that there are always, always, ALWAYS super geniuses like you and bja and others who rush to ACKSHUALLY provide "alternatives" that aren't actually alternatives?


> Why is it that there are always, always, ALWAYS super geniuses like you and bja and others who rush to ACKSHUALLY provide "alternatives" that aren't actually alternatives?

Please avoid fulminating or sneering like this on HN, it's clearly against the guidelines.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


Look, people fall into all sorts of categories based on various individual characteristics. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. It sounds like maybe you don't like seeing ideas that aren't best for you?

Let me encourage you to just keep scrolling if someone's idea doesn't fit you personally.


It'd be one thing if you offered a complete solution, even if cumbersome. Lots of open source projects require more steps than, and have various limitations compared to, their commercial counterparts; heck, for many of us, those extra steps are a feature, not a bug.

But all you did was to mention Google Voice, not exactly an obscure VoIP product and which, again, does not provide a whitelist. A whitelist is fundamental to this product's raison d'être, and to its appeal to parents. If you can't understand that, I don't know what else to say.


Dude, like I said - if my idea isn't your cup of tea, why the outrage? It took me time and effort to type it out that I could have spent elsewhere, but I wanted to help (some of) my HN community -- ok not you but why be upset at me?

It's a different idea from TA with a different set of ideal users. But it's a better idea for some who don't need all the features and want to pay less. The idea may not be perfect but it was free (but not for me).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: