There's no appeal to emotion here. They're saying that people who had an outsized influence in electing this administration have an outsized responsibility for its outcomes.

Also, people dying or getting ill isn't an emotion.

Labeling someone's argument a fallacy without addressing the substance does nothing but dodge the point, nor does it prove the argument incorrect. It's specious; an argument from fallacy.

Thank you Spock.

which would matter if we were using logical arguments about unambiguous things. So far as I can tell, the only thing which can be argued about logically is mathematics.