Here's the thing. The website doesn't say that 80% of the code was created using AI. That's what the fake article claims. What the site actually says is:
---
Natasha is your AI product manager.
Using machine learning algorithms, she recommends the features you need, based on the type of app you're building.
Natasha also creates an instant prototype for you, helping visualise your idea.
80% of this information is gathered automatically.
---
A few things to point out:
1. The site says it uses algorithms, not GenAI, to make recommendations and create a prototype. I assume that means some visual mockups or images of the suggested features.
2. It says it creates "80% of the information", not 80% of the code. That line is clearly referring to the recommendations, not the final software.
People spreading fake news scanned the site, misunderstood how AI works, and twisted the wording to fit their own narrative.
If you scroll down it also says 60% of the code is automated. Both percentages are essentially meaningless. If you require customers to type all their requirements into a static web based form does that also count as 80% automated information gathering? If 60% of an application is templated components does that mean code generation is 60% automated?
It's meaningless, and I suspect intentionally so. It clearly implies that they were doing things in a more advanced way than a standard Indian outsourcing firm, an implication heightened by hiring people to build impressive tech demos. But the impressive tech demos and the work on real client projects were two entirely separate things.
Here's the thing. The website doesn't say that 80% of the code was created using AI. That's what the fake article claims. What the site actually says is:
---
Natasha is your AI product manager.
Using machine learning algorithms, she recommends the features you need, based on the type of app you're building.
Natasha also creates an instant prototype for you, helping visualise your idea.
80% of this information is gathered automatically.
---
A few things to point out:
1. The site says it uses algorithms, not GenAI, to make recommendations and create a prototype. I assume that means some visual mockups or images of the suggested features.
2. It says it creates "80% of the information", not 80% of the code. That line is clearly referring to the recommendations, not the final software.
People spreading fake news scanned the site, misunderstood how AI works, and twisted the wording to fit their own narrative.