There's no evidence for that. It's very easy to write in a blog post "they told me" or "an engineer said".
Why don't they contact the Head of AI, Craig Saunders (ex-Director of Amazon AI), and ask him directly. This was never done, which raises serious doubts about the credibility of the person who wrote it.
We need to stick to the facts, especially now that pseudo-journalists are flooding the web with fake news.
Let's keep this site reliable, please.
I read their site and blog, and they have a lot of screenshots of their internal apps.
And here's the project progress dashboard showing how long it takes to build. In this case, it's 7 months. Clearly, there's no GenAI involved if it takes that long:
They also show in the menu things like "Releases" and "Meet the squad" (I'm assuming the devs). It can't be fake! One of them shows templates of well known sites. Based on what I read, you choose a template, Natasha or something else handles the assembly, which I assume is just a fancy way of saying it checks out a repo and installs dependencies. Then the Indian programmers do the rest. This is clearly explained on their website.
Take a look at their blog. There's plenty of information about their apps, which were reviewed by Microsoft before they invested 250 million.
The CEO and CFO committed fraud. That has been proven and there is no doubt about it.
But you are not going after them. You are accusing the Head of AI of lying. This is someone who spent seven years at Amazon, led the AI department, and is well known and respected in the community. You are also ignoring all the information posted on the company's blog, site, linkedin, and social media.
Do you really expect me, or anyone in the AI/ML space, to believe a blogger who doesn't know the difference between AI and GenAI? No chance. We do not take it lightly when a blogger tries to damage the reputation of someone who has earned the respect of the industry just for clicks or ad revenue.
I'm more interested in the truth than in ruining people's careers.
Why don't they contact the Head of AI, Craig Saunders (ex-Director of Amazon AI), and ask him directly. This was never done, which raises serious doubts about the credibility of the person who wrote it.
We need to stick to the facts, especially now that pseudo-journalists are flooding the web with fake news.
Let's keep this site reliable, please.
I read their site and blog, and they have a lot of screenshots of their internal apps.
Here's the dashboard where you choose an app: https://www.builder.ai/images/Choose.jpg
And here's the project progress dashboard showing how long it takes to build. In this case, it's 7 months. Clearly, there's no GenAI involved if it takes that long:
https://www.builder.ai/images/builder-studio-project-progres...
They also show in the menu things like "Releases" and "Meet the squad" (I'm assuming the devs). It can't be fake! One of them shows templates of well known sites. Based on what I read, you choose a template, Natasha or something else handles the assembly, which I assume is just a fancy way of saying it checks out a repo and installs dependencies. Then the Indian programmers do the rest. This is clearly explained on their website.
Take a look at their blog. There's plenty of information about their apps, which were reviewed by Microsoft before they invested 250 million.
Verdict: FAKE NEWS