That on its own is a security risk, as it would introduce means to hide a commit... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		OptionOfT 9 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Converting a Git repo from tabs to spaces (2016) That on its own is a security risk, as it would introduce means to hide a commit in the commit itself. At least with the . file you have to make 2 separate transactions.

IshKebab 9 months ago [–]

No it wouldn't. You would still be able to see the commit in logs and file histories and if you ran blame without the skipping option.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact