Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Quora's latest investment round (May) valued the company at $400M [1]. According to Alexa, Quora has perhaps 1% of the traffic of Wikipedia. It seems to me that Quora has two options:

1) Be acquired by Facebook or Google. The problem is that it's no Instagram, so today it could not command a significant premium over the valuation of the latest round.

2) Find a way to make money. Just like Facebook or Twitter, ads seem to be the only way. Only, it does not have the traffic; no growth at all in the past year [2]. Therefore, the management must be doing everything they possibly can to improve their metrics. It's do or die, goodwill be damned.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quora#cite_note-15

[2] http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/quora.com



I always wanted an internal Quora at my company - I figured that was a possible product for them in the future.


AskBot is an open-source StackOverflow clone that has a hosted option. (Easier than hosting it yourself, since correctly installing can be tricky.)

AnswerHub (formerly Qato) is a managed clone of Quora for orgs. They caused quite an uproar because they originally hewed much too closely to Quora's design.

[edit: I see that AnswerHub is now more like StackOverflow.]


If I worked for a big company, I'd love this (or, a Quora for a loose social network like HN people, YC companies, attendees of a series of security conferences, a university department, etc.). Makes a lot less sense for a 3 person startup (at that scale, email and/or wiki makes more sense).

I think Opzi was also potentially this at one point in the past, but just like everyone else doing "enterprise Q&A", pivoted away. I think there's no way to build something which makes money, is simple, is usable and worth using, and complies with stupid enterprise policies on Q&A.


Ditto, I'd like it if they would offer it out as a whitelabel solution.

It's much better away of dealing with somethings than an FAQ or endless forums.


It's possible, but run the numbers. Companies that would pay for that * monthly price = ?

Very hard to justify a Twitter-like valuation with that.


Yes its true, they can't be twitter but they have a fine product which can be monetized without taking away from their shoot for the stars plans.

I always believe in having a profit, so when you fail in shooting-for-the-stars you fail into profitability, stability, and the dolldroms of merely having six figures in your salary instead of eight in your stock portfolio.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: