Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

PEGs don't have this problem right? Linear time over length of input? Though I guess most peg libraries probably aren't "pure" pegs to get around its limitations and may reintroduce this issue?


No, PEG is prone to exactly this in its default form. Parser combinator usually means something PEG-ish anyway.

If you memoize (packrat), it improves to polynomial time (not sure what, but it's not linear; that's false advertising and a fraudulent claim), but you're still stuck with the vulnerability to bugs in the grammar.

A better idea is to create a parser-combinator-style API on top of an LL or LR backend, for guaranteed linear time and only enough stack space for the deepest part of the AST.


PEGs don't have this problem only because they place restrictions on the grammar.

In practice, this isn't a problem, but it does require you write grammar rules in a specific way (e.g. no left-recursion)


Only if a packrat parser is implemented, which requires a lot of memory.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: