I'm well aware of the words you've written. Are you waiting for me to say you're right, or that you make a good point? Do you think people think of the Nazis' economic programs before anything else?
You dodge the question that puts the lie to your high-minded concern about using words according to their precise definition, which is unreasonable and serves to inhibit discourse, as you must realize.
You need only actually read one of his executive orders - again, ILLEGALLY directing appropriated funds not be spent - to see that cutting government is not the only thing these ideologues are attempting to do.
You might, finally, look into what Godwin himself has said regarding his "law" and Trump.
No, I was hoping you might substantiate your claims. Cutting spending stands in direct contrast to totalitarian ideology. If you cannot approach that we shall move on.
>removing undesirables from public life and generally making society less racially mixed.
Is this what you think debating is? It's pretty pathetic. I'll make you a deal, I'll substantiate a claim or two if you stop consistently ignoring which specific costs the administration is "cutting", and why. Read the executive order on education.
And again, I must say to anyone who doesn't have their head in the clouds, they are breaking federal law by not spending congressionally-appropriated funds.
You dodge the question that puts the lie to your high-minded concern about using words according to their precise definition, which is unreasonable and serves to inhibit discourse, as you must realize.
You need only actually read one of his executive orders - again, ILLEGALLY directing appropriated funds not be spent - to see that cutting government is not the only thing these ideologues are attempting to do.
You might, finally, look into what Godwin himself has said regarding his "law" and Trump.