Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For example how it cites the cass report that's been debunked quite a few times already


The Cass Review covers a lot of ground. Which parts of relevance to that article are you claiming have been "debunked", and on what basis?


I posted one of the better critiques (by Yale) already in the parent comment you're reacting to




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: