Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> amount of roughly 10^160000000000000.

You're also underestimating the accuracy by the absurd amount of roughly 10^202000000000000 ;)

You need ~ zero of the digits of the calculated pi to do OPs calculation.

[edit] My brains melting, I think I'm wrong and you are underestimating the underestimation of the accuracy by the absurd amount of roughly 10^42000000000000. OP is underestimating by 10^202000000000000.



Yes, your edit is correct.


To be fair, he did say "roughly".

And boy, that was a shaffing error.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: