THIS. And the moment that the client expresses reservations about this strategy (which your approach to the subject was trying to elicit), you start talking about the alternatives to continued use of Adobe.
You granting someone rights to material you don’t have makes you liable twice right? If your friend lent you his car and you lent it to someone else, you become liable twice not zero times.
You don't have the right to upload your client's product, yet you use software that uploads your client's product.
You're correct that the two conflict, but I think the courts would have a problem with you for using a product that breaches the employment contract you signed rather than rule that Adobe is at fault here.
I think so, you have to pull in the customer and let them know you planning on using the adobe product and since adobe demands they have full access to the customer’s proprietary media they will have to agree to that as well. How that happens I’m not sure? Have them buy an adobe license for you to use? I guess at that point you need lawyers or their full permission to hand over their ideas to Adobe, otherwise you’re gonna be libel if it leaks/gets copied/etc
Having them buy a license would probably work. You could also have this stuff specified in your contract with your employer.
Realistically, businesses will either shrug and be fine with you using Adobe stuff, or they'll find someone else (who still uses Photoshop, but doesn't know or warn about this stuff). I doubt the person hiring artists knows or cares about this stuff until an actual leak takes place.
I don't have the rights of my client's product.
I want to see how it plays in court.