Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No I am not, I am still engaging in the conversation.

But there is very little I can actually say when your response is that it is anti-semitic.

You are no longer responding to what was actually said and instead pivoting it to something else that does not leave anything to respond too since you are not addressing what you are responding too in the first place.

And again you are doing the same thing here, instead of actually trying to have a conversation you shut it down by claiming it is antisemitic. That isn't a conversation, that is a pivot to try to end it.

I also never claimed it did not exist.

Over the last several months I have seen many conversations just end with "that's anti-semitic" because it was any amount of criticism as if we have to accept that and that's the end of the conversation.

Well it's not and shouldn't be, you made a claim and I am challenging it.



> Do you find it concerning that no presidential candidate can even pass the primary without first kissing the ring of AIPAC? That Zionist lobby openly attacks insufficiently pro-Zionist candidates and then openly brags when they lose elections? With Zionist lobby trying to outlaw any criticism of Israel in direct violation of 1st amendment? Etc, etc. IDK about others, but I think this is insane.

* foaming at the mouth *

kiss the ring, AIPAC, Zionist, Zionist, Zionist

Fixed that for you.


I... have no idea what your point is with this...

Edit: If I can figure out what you are trying to say

Was the person I responding too slightly exaggerating? Sure.

But we know for a fact that a lot of money flows from AIPAC to candidates that support strong ties with Israel. That isn't a secret. Saying that isn't anti-semitic.

If that is not your point, please let me know what it is so I can properly respond.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: