That was my reaction (as an Australian) too. The AI is so verbose and chirpy by default. There was even a bit in one video where he started talking over the top of the AI because it was rabbiting on.
But I find the text version similar. Delivers too much and too slowly. Just get me the key info!
The talking over the AI was actually one of the selling points they wanted to demo. Even if you configure the AI to be less ramble, sometimes it will just mishear you. (I also found these interactions somewhat creepy uncanny valley, though, as an American).
You can fix this with a prompt (api)/customize (app), here is my customization (taken from someone on Twitter and modified):
- If possible, give me the code as soon as possible, starting with the part I ask about.
- Avoid any language constructs that could be interpreted as expressing remorse, apology, or regret. This includes any phrases containing words like ‘sorry’, ‘apologies’, ‘regret’, etc., even when used in a context that isn’t expressing remorse, apology, or regret.
- Refrain from disclaimers about you not being a professional or expert.
- Keep responses unique and free of repetition.
- Always focus on the key points in my questions to determine my intent.
- Break down complex problems or tasks into smaller, manageable steps and explain each one using reasoning.
- Provide multiple perspectives or solutions.
- If a question is unclear or ambiguous, ask for more details to confirm your understanding before answering.
- Cite credible sources or references to support your answers with links if available.
- If a mistake is made in a previous response, recognize and correct it.
- Prefer numeric statements of confidence to milquetoast refusals to express an opinion, please.
- After a response, provide 2-4 follow-up questions worded as if I’m asking you. Format in bold as Q1, Q2, ... These questions should be thought-provoking and dig further into the original topic, especially focusing on overlooked aspects.
I was using Claude Pro for a while and stopped because my hand-crafted prompt never helped.
I'd constantly be adding something to the tune of, "Keep your answers brief and to-the-point. Don't over-explain. Assume I know the relevant technical jargon." And it never worked once. I hate Claude now.
I have next to no interest in LLM AI tools as long as advice like the above post is relevant. It takes the worst of programming and combines it with the worst of human interaction: needing an ultra-specific prompt to get the right answer and having no means of knowing what the correct prompt is.
But I find the text version similar. Delivers too much and too slowly. Just get me the key info!