Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

CEO of Tile/Life360 here - I made a meta comment but I'll call out that because all Life360 users now scan for Tiles, and we are on 1 in 8 phones in the US, our network is actually huge. The small network thing is a misperception. We bought Tile knowing we could supercharge their previously small network.


This very same company used to sell real-time location data of your family: https://www.theverge.com/2021/12/9/22820381/tile-life360-loc...

Personally I wouldn't purchase anything connected to that network, even if they now say they stopped selling precise data.


I was in the location data space. These guys got out completely. It was a big loss to the industry since they had great coverage. They definitely weren’t lying about that.


Wow, that's awesome. This is the closest I've been to someone directly exploiting my privacy for financial gain. Thank you for linking that article.


I'm a Tile owner (soon to be ex-owner), and I think your response is a little disingenuous. When Google announced recently they'd open up their Find My Device network to bluetooth trackers, I assumed for sure Tile would be on board. I was dismayed to discover Tile specifically has no plans to join the Android Find My Device network, unlike Chipolo and Pebblebee. So I switched to Pebblebee.

The Life360 network may be sizable but it's going to me nowhere close to the iOS or Android networks, and it's going to get a lot smaller with folks like me leaving. If Tile supported the Android Find My Device network I would have stayed.


Thanks for pointing me to Pebblebee. Recommend trying it out?


I lost my wallet in Seattle, which fwiw is a first tier tech city and it still is detected once every 4 days


Please stop promoting your product multiple times in the thread, it feels like spam and doesn't add much value to this discussion.


I disagree. There's a clear disclaimer of who they are, and they're responding to a specific criticism.

Their comment at the top level also has that disclaimer and while it's written in a bit of a marketing tone, it adds substantive value to the discussion.

One major value of HN is that we get people who are actively involved in building various pieces of technology directly engaging with the community. When there's a strong disclosure of who they are, that's almost always a good thing. (Of course, some organisations don't encourage that disclosure and that's a little more ambiguous).


I think it's pretty fair to make this clarification and I don't fault a company for wanting to squash misinformation about their product. I found it to be a useful comment because I had no sense of the scale of the Tile network, and I did have an intuition that it was much smaller.

I have zero affiliation with Tile and I have never bought any device like this of any sort, but this is useful information to me as someone who has been the target of frequent bicycle theft.

The criticism I will agree with is that it does feel worded a with a bit of a corporate polished tone that does give that vibe. edit: I think it's largely the "supercharge" descriptor.


Like @RobertRies, I found this comment useful. I've never bought a Tile but now that I know they have this much penetration I'm somewhat more likely to. I also had not seen the other posts by GP, so don't find it redundant.


Thank you, that's useful to know.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: