> the way a language structures the world for you in the way its vocab influences the way you think in concepts
You can even see it in this article :)
"Learn only 4 tenses. Past for one time events, past continuous, present, future. These are enough to go by and explain yourself."
Some lanuages don't even have 4 tenses. Polish has 3. And Past Continuous isn't a thing, we have aspects instead.
BTW I don't intend to criticize the author, they're far more of a polyglot than I am (I only speak 4 languages, and only 2 well). It's just funny how we take some things for granted.
I think that the author's intent can be meaningful understood without the implication that they don't know about other languages.
I think a reasonable interpretation of the statement is "learn how to use verbs such that you can talk about doing something now, doing something in the future, having done something and continuing to do it, and having some something and since stopped doing it."
In every language humans are capable of expressing those distinct concepts. But boy, that was an awful lot wordier than the way the author put it.
Native speakers of slavic languages tend to believe that there are three tenses.
Try asking that someone who learned it as a second language and you'll realize that native french/english speakers think that slavic languages have 6+ tenses to them. Aspekt dokonany i niedokonany basically doubles number of tenses.
You can even see it in this article :)
"Learn only 4 tenses. Past for one time events, past continuous, present, future. These are enough to go by and explain yourself."
Some lanuages don't even have 4 tenses. Polish has 3. And Past Continuous isn't a thing, we have aspects instead.
BTW I don't intend to criticize the author, they're far more of a polyglot than I am (I only speak 4 languages, and only 2 well). It's just funny how we take some things for granted.