Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One thing that these kind of studies usually haven't counted is comparison of graduate income with their parents' income, which usually are highly correlated. This is why there are some claim that philosophy or art major have some of the highest incomes, people who take that major usually are high class already. If this study is somehow able to eliminate that bias, I bet even more majors will have negative ROI.


> One thing that these kind of studies usually haven't counted is comparison of graduate income with their parents' income

This particular study actually does try to take that into account:

> I estimate counterfactual earnings for each program’s typical students, based on their demographics, socioeconomic status, academic ability, family background, and geographic location. [https://freopp.org/does-college-pay-off-a-comprehensive-retu...]


Ah, one really needs to read the referred article directly to know this. Nice to know that it's actually already accounted.

Still, I don't actually get how he counts the socioeconomic factor and get the "without-degree income"?


I couldn't find an explanation either. They mention a paper somewhere, but all the links just point to that Medium article which doesn't explain the methodology in enough detail to replicate.


Which means more people should go into vocational style degrees or engineering if they want to have a positive ROI




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: