Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Database PKs usually aren’t random, which AFAIK is what is usually used as the number in this case.


Database PK really shouldn't be exposed like this. I think that's what they're getting at, though. The thing is, sequential database PK is still shorter and more readable than a Sqid.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: