In this recent podcast, Lina Khan explicitly mentions deterrence as a tool in FTC's arsenal and the overall recent setbacks.
I do think that getting companies worth $1T to behave is going to take multiple attempts and here we give lots of leeway to Founders and others to iterate and refine.
I would like to give Lina Khan the same chances to iterate and refine as I very strongly support the grand parents views of how important this is to innovation and for startups.
> Lina Khan explicitly mentions deterrence as a tool in FTC's arsenal
That’s cute. In the real world, most executives will take a few months of mean words from a largely-ignored regulator in exchange for a deal. Deterrence needs to be backed up, in the end, to actually deter.
Considering how shit scared Facebook is and Amazon seems to be on the acquisitions front, I'd say it's a strategy that's working to a degree. That being said, it has allowed so much leeway with Microsoft though, but I'd say that it's going to end very badly for Microsoft over the next decade, assuming there isn't a president let loose who can give Big Tech more leeway and a looser hand.
In this recent podcast, Lina Khan explicitly mentions deterrence as a tool in FTC's arsenal and the overall recent setbacks.
I do think that getting companies worth $1T to behave is going to take multiple attempts and here we give lots of leeway to Founders and others to iterate and refine.
I would like to give Lina Khan the same chances to iterate and refine as I very strongly support the grand parents views of how important this is to innovation and for startups.
https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5ucHIub3J...