As another commenter mentioned, it's common practice to shove all your device's functionality into one characteristic to reduce service discovery time (and, in some cases, memory footprint in firmware). With that in mind, can OpenBLE be used to describe the structure of the bytes being read, written, and indicated by the characteristics?
OpenAPI is useful because it not only generates a frontend for testing an API, it also can be used to generate the skeleton of an API's implementation. Can I generate Zephyr macros using this tool? Can I generate Android or iOS code? A complete tool should be able to generate firmware, Android, and iOS code for both a GATT server and client.
As a professional firmware engineer working in IoT, I'd advise against hanging your hat on Web Bluetooth. Bluetooth is already rife with security problems, and exposing direct control of it to a browser is asking for zero-day nightmares. This is beside the antipattern involved in asking web apps to directly control a peripheral's communication interface.
> I'd advise against hanging your hat on Web Bluetooth. Bluetooth is already rife with security problems, and exposing direct control of it to a browser is asking for zero-day nightmares.
Which is why (quoting OP) Mozilla has 'shunned' it. Apple too perhaps (though the reasoning isn't open afaik, and Safari omits more or adopts more slowly in general than can be ascribed to security/privacy concerns).
Hey, thanks for checking out my project. So the spec is independent of Web Bluetooth; like Swagger is to Swagger UI. I considered electron but it needs installation and wouldn't run on mobiles. Perhaps Web Bluetooth is not ready for devices, but is perfect for dev tools like this one.
As of today it can generate an Arduino GATT server; I'm working to support more platforms, Zephyr, iOS etc.
OpenAPI is useful because it not only generates a frontend for testing an API, it also can be used to generate the skeleton of an API's implementation. Can I generate Zephyr macros using this tool? Can I generate Android or iOS code? A complete tool should be able to generate firmware, Android, and iOS code for both a GATT server and client.
As a professional firmware engineer working in IoT, I'd advise against hanging your hat on Web Bluetooth. Bluetooth is already rife with security problems, and exposing direct control of it to a browser is asking for zero-day nightmares. This is beside the antipattern involved in asking web apps to directly control a peripheral's communication interface.