Right. That still takes as many man-hours as the opening hours of the store. Which is much different from the jobs where time isn't part of the output. Which is the whole point I'm making.
Picking all the oranges from a grove takes eight hours today. Maybe I can do it in six hours if...
Turning an inbox worth of papers takes eight hours today. Maybe I can do it in six hours if...
Keeping the store open for eight hours takes eight hours today. It will always take eight hours. Because the hours are part of the output.
>That still takes as many man-hours as the opening hours of the store. Which is much different from the jobs where time isn't part of the output
It's not about output, it's about quality of life and not making people work their lives away for corporate billionaires. If you need more manpower than a full time working hours, said billionaire corporations pay more for it in overtime or reduce hours.
To go off your metaphors, you (the corporation) can pick oranges, in the grove in 6 hours if you hire more skilled labor. If that's not possible (or if said labor is too expensive), you hire more people to make it possible. If a store needs to stay open for 8 hours with 6 hour workers, you pay 2 hours overtime or pay for two employees with overlapping shifts. Pay for your labor.
A store isn't a baby, one employee isn't needed 24/7 to keep the lights on.