AlphaSite: "Google has a monopoly and used it to build a second monopoly [argument]"

There isn't much there to address. But I did directly address it.

(1) He claimed that Google had a monopoly, I ignored that because I'd addressed that in my original comment.

(2) He claimed that Chrome had a monopoly. I provided an argument that it wasn't (it is really easy not to use Chrome. You give up literally nothing switching to Brave for example).

(3) He claimed that Googe used monopoly tactics to build Chrome's market share. I provided a counterexample that the tactics used aren't monopoly tactics because other companies do more or less the same thing. Advertising your own products on your own site isn't monopoly behaviour. And even if Google was a monopoly and that is monopoly behavior - both of which I don't think are true - that isn't exactly an abuse of monopoly power, it is pretty tame.

It'd be helpful for me if you pointed out why you don't think that is addressing the comment. It seemed pretty direct to me.