Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think this representation is a bit misleading.

They considered intervening with them, which by far doesn't mean banning them.

To put it into context after their acquisition they had been pushing podcasts in general, white noise podcast accidentally profited from it, and a bit too much.

Which is with what they considered intervening with.

But banning them would have been the last step if others don't work.

And even then you still would have white noise songs, just not podcasts. Or more likely podcast just not promoted, i.e. you need to more explicitly look for them.

I.e. the chance for Spotify removing users access to white noise content was close to non-existing as far I can tell.



Well yes, they could forbid publishing noise on the platform, and just offer their own white noise content for users to access.


What’s your source on all of this?


It's basically all present in the article




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: