Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I quibble with the notion that there is "good" and "bad" social media, at least as you implicitly defined.

Facebook was amazing when it first came out because it allowed people to keep in touch easier and share photos with each other. It also is arguably the progenitor of "bad" social media with tallied likes/reactions and algorithmic skinner boxing of posts.

Unfortunately, it boils down more to usage than whether or not a site is a "good/bad" social media. And even a good one can turn bad if it gets too popular and the culture dies (reddit)

I don't really know how to feel about it. To me, it feels like smartphones. I recognize the utility but at the same time know that the manufacturers/developers are intentionally designing psychologically addictive patterns to keep me engaged, and am inclined to utilize it less as a result. Which in turn limits the utility I get out of them!



We live in an environment of dark patterns and sophisticated engines designed for addiction.

Our attention - and our kids attention is being extracted and resold.

The algorithm-ization of social media feeds to promote addictive behaviors optimized to maximize addiction triggers for the personality of every single individual + the maximization of paid content (sometimes ads, sometimes secretly promoted) has long replaced the feeds serving the interest of the user.

The enshittification of social media is in place and the platforms are basically competing to squeeze the last few remaining drops of our attention, already having collected and monetized most of that resource.


Good and bad social media doesn't have to be rigidly defined along brand/product lines.

Facebook can be an extremely helpful and useful tool for keeping in touch with your friends and something that is addictive and harmful to your mental health.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: