> The economic benefits of mining asteroids are also too large
Ironically, that's an example I like to list as "pure sci-fi fantasy, divorced from economic reality."
The total cost of the iron ore that goes into making a new a car is about $200-$300 dollars, depending on various factors (size of the car, ore spot price, etc...).
Even if -- magically -- asteroid mining made not just "iron ore", but specifically the steel alloy used for car bodies literally free, new cars costing $30,000 would now cost... $29,700.
You can save more by skipping the optional coffee cup warmer, or whatever.
In reality: 90% of iron and steel is recycled, and asteroid mining is not magic.
Why would anyone want to mine asteroids for iron, given that it's the most abundant element on Earth? I don't think I ever recall seeing a proposal like that outside of the broader notion of "space factories" (where such mining makes sense to reduce the cost of shipping materials back and forth, not because it's cheaper as such).
It's stuff like platinum and germanium that makes asteroid mining potentially interesting.
On Earth, geological processes concentrate elements into ores, primarily through volcanic and hydrological means. Neither are available in small, cold asteroids devoid of liquid water. Hence asteroids are generally undifferentiated mineralogically, making mining them much less economically viable.
You often see total quantities listed as an amazing thing, glossing over the fact that the Earth has more of everything and in usefully concentrated lumps.
Market competition and innovation in both ML and hardware has consistently driven down the price of AI in the past decade. You only have to look at where we are with capabilities today compared to ten years ago when CIFAR100 classifiers were the state of the art.
Barring a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, these APIs will halve in price over the next year.
What would a Chinese invasion of Taiwan do to "tech", it sounds like it would be awfully catastrophic ?
On the other hand, for all peoples worrying about China, they are pretty restrained given the enormous turmoil the invasion would cause. If they wanted to break the USA, now would probably be the time to do it?
Given what's used right now to my knowledge, the main ones would be Nvidia's tensor cores, Apple's M chips and Google's cloud TPUs. All of that's TSMC I think?
Just a few manufacturers hold the effective cartel monopoly on LLM acceleration and you best bet they will charge out the ass for it.