Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Tell HN: GPT-4 is not like Linux
5 points by tkiolp4 on March 26, 2023 | hide | past | favorite | 5 comments
I’m always positive about progress. What I love the most about programming/computers/software is that you can use for free the best software out there and as soon as it’s out. No questions asked. No credit card required.

I have learned Linux, C++, awk, TCP/IP, and countless of top-notch software in the past: all I needed was a computer and perhaps internet connection. I’m still learning this way. There’s so much high-quality stuff out there for free. I’m very grateful for that.

Now, when it comes to top-notch LLMs like GPT-4/Copilot, it seems like I need to ask for permission to use it. I need to register myself in their website, give away my email and phone number, and pay in order to use their API. This feels terrible awful. I cannot play around with GPT-4 on my own computer for free. Perhaps in a few years we’ll get powerful enough models to be able to run just fine in normal laptops (but by that time I imagine commercial models will be orders of magnitude more powerful as well… so what’s the point).

I just cannot share the enthusiasm many folks here have about GPT-4 and similars. Imagine today is 1991 and some amazing unix-like operating system has appeared: in order to use it and learn it, you just have to pay $0.0000001 per command line executed. No free alternative exists (at least not one that is that good). Imagine growing in that alternate universe and being a programmer. Imagine you have to pay for every line of code you write in your free time.

Do we really want to promote OpenAI? I don’t want to live in a reality in which I have to pay for every program I write on my free time (I’m assuming here that in a few years, OpenAI will be as ubiquitous as Linux is right now).



I understand this sentiment - it’s just another step of monetized lifestyle. The internet was never free. Remember all those free internet AOL cd-roms? It was never really free. Telephone calls, same. Never had free calls either. OpenAI can be compared to a telephone network operator. They built a system that people want to use, we got to pay. However maybe the tools OpenAI are developing become so ingrained into the publics life that they eventually become public utilities. We still have to pay.


You ARE paying more than $0.0000001 per command land executed in linux if you factor in your hardware investment end electricity.


Many components of computation started as premium offerings and are now free or virtually free. Why would this be different?


The software mentioned above (Linux and others like GCC) started and remained free. I think it’s crucial to keep the foundations of the software industry as open as possible.


Because with LLMs, bigger is better; monopolisation will be rapid and unassailable, smaller players won't get a look-in.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: