Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The argument, as I understand it, is that disabling someone's ability to do speech is categorically censorship.


Sure, call it censorship. I maintain that it's legally permissible to ban shit-posters for misconduct. I'd further argue that failing to ban shit-posters will dissuade 3d printing enthusiasts from using a particular forum, granting the shit-posters a heckler's veto which is its own form of censorship.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: