Mostly all of the volunteers did not support going into partnership with freenode. Thomas was one of the only ones who wanted it (and he only did it when mostly all of the tech team threatned to quit)
No implication that there wasn't also pushback internally was intended, my apologies for the fact that now I look at it again, my comment can clearly be read that way.
I kept to a generic 'they' because the communications in question were private so while I'm comfortable revealing they existed I felt keeping the description deliberately vague was only fair.
Took them a few days to realise their mistake though, so they still got to eat a bunch of reputational fallout anyway.
(source: told them it was a terrible idea beforehand, got contacted back extremely sheepishly when they realised I'd been right)