No? The syntax and standard library is vastly different in terms of ergonomics. You could argue whether its better but it's undeniably more familiar to non-erlangers.
(Alternatively, you already are using Erlang anyway.)
Better documentation, better package management, testing framework, consistent function calls, opinionated standards on how to name things (get vs fetch, ! suffix for crashables, is vs ?, size vs length), Protocols, not having lexical macros, not needing make, Testing Framework, compile environments (test, dev, prod), $callers, custom guards, Task, Registry, DynamicSupervisor, IO.inspect (now dbg), mix tasks, TESTING FRAMEWORK...
(Alternatively, you already are using Erlang anyway.)