> I’m afraid I don’t understand how Twitter can end up with debt from Musk buying it. How does that even work?
This article explains: (a) how leveraged buyouts work, (b) how Musk's acquisition is different from a regular LBO, and (c) what debt Twitter now has due to the deal.
Edit: I must say that even after I read it I have trouble understanding how any of that happens except through well connected people moving money around to their own benefit.
The banks are on the hook, but it’s not really the banks because it’s not their money they are lending out.
I worked on Wall Street for years, a long time ago when leveraged buy-outs first really got going.
So I really understand them.
And I agree with you. "Leverage" means multiplying both risk and reward. Given a system where losses are socialized, and wins are privatized, it makes complete sense to do LBOs as much as possible - the people with money win, and everyone else loses.
This article explains: (a) how leveraged buyouts work, (b) how Musk's acquisition is different from a regular LBO, and (c) what debt Twitter now has due to the deal.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/elon-musks-twitter-d...