Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What will most likely happen is that the prices of pork will go up in Cali to accommodate for their laws and stay the same everywhere else.

Regulation simply equals increased prices which is essentially a tax on the middle class and poor.

Whatever was regulated will become a luxury. The rich will have it but the middle class and poor will not.

See car prices, gas prices, food prices, liquor licenses, etc. Anything the government gets it's hand on to regulate increases prices.

The rich don't notice the increased cost of regulation but the middle class and poor suffer.



> What will most likely happen is that the prices of pork will go up in Cali

That assumes:

* either pork production for CA takes place only inside CA or in other states they have two levels of pork production

* if the latter, this further requires that pork producers are happy maintaining two levels of production

* it also requires that no or few other states follow CA lead on requirements

> Regulation simply equals increased prices

Regulation is often (not always, but often) about bring externalities into the actual cost. So the full picture of the result of regulation needs to include:

* what were the externalities now being priced?

* where was the cost of the externalities previously experienced (e.g. poor communities dealing with runoff and waste from pork production)

* what was the full cost of the externalities before regulation bought some of them into the actual price?

* what are the remaining externalities after the regulation


adding additional friction to a process always increases the difficulty of the process and the cost of overcoming that friction is always borne by the consumer.


who bears the cost of not adequately regulating production and disposal processes?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: