What you are saying is: "tailwind class names are cumulative and so verbosein the HTML tag that it negates the benefits of smaller CSS and eat the bytes saved?". Am I reading that right ?
And this does make a difference when your entire layout is done with Tailwind. Consider that the HTML, unlike the CSS, might typically not be cached, and that the server is now also charged with emitting higher loads of data. Consider also that all these utility classes are all loaded in the CSS on the front page even if some or most of them is used on everything except the front page. The performance win is not as unquestionable as Tailwind would like to suggest.