Yeah, the article seems to be more about promoting a certain political meta-narrative than actually analyzing the bill. Parts of it are misleading and it doesn't link to the actual bill, which any normal blogger would do within the very first paragraph.
The whole point of the article is to discuss the political meta-narrative. If you’re just looking for the substance of the bill, and you’re especially not interested if it hasn’t been signed into law, this article isn’t for you.
The article does exactly that under the subheading “The Substance”, and in the first sentence thereof also links to earlier articles expanding on the contents of the bill.
I would suggest looking into all the work by this writer. This guy wrote a huge book on the subject, along with a regular newsletter, which this article is part of.
