This looks like an article that wanted to give a particular outcome (that trees are not enough) and backed into that out with a study that “proved” it.
However I can’t find a link to the actual study in the article.
Has there ever been a study that linked the increase in CO2 to the increased logging efforts in places around the world?
It's alarming how much ignorance there is about forests being carbon neutral in steady state. The sooner we can get cars and power plants off fossil fuels the better.
However I can’t find a link to the actual study in the article.
Has there ever been a study that linked the increase in CO2 to the increased logging efforts in places around the world?