Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Seems like they're making slightly different arguments. Dorsey is saying it was wrong to permenantly ban, rather than suspend Trump.

He's also saying it was a business decision, and it shouldn't have been. Honestly I don't know what that means. Every decision Twitter makes is a business decision. He violated the rules repeatedly and got away with it, I think it was absolutely the right choice.



>He's also saying it was a business decision, and it shouldn't have been. Honestly I don't know what that means.

It means the decision was driven by which option drives higher profit, and not a moral position.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: