That seems like an unfair criticism of Zig to me. The project is very clear that the language isn't stable, the compiler has bugs, the generated docs being no good and releases not being backwards compatible. The community is onboard with that. If you're doing something with Zig, you're not going to complain that for example 0.9.0 required a find'n'replace to fix every occurrence of Allocator or changed the layout of std.os.