The reaction then should be curiosity and a starting place for research, not the uninformed outrage that the article is peddling.
Once you start looking at the numbers behind this, it's almost guaranteed that the real picture will be less outragous and suggest different policy prescriptions than whatever you might think looking at the headline.
Or maybe you already know the details, and already know what we should do. But if so, you got your information from elsewhere, because the article doesn't offer much.
Once you start looking at the numbers behind this, it's almost guaranteed that the real picture will be less outragous and suggest different policy prescriptions than whatever you might think looking at the headline.
Or maybe you already know the details, and already know what we should do. But if so, you got your information from elsewhere, because the article doesn't offer much.